Ross Hauser, MD

Some people describe a frightening pattern: “When I turn my head, I become dizzy. My vision changes, and sometimes I feel as though I might pass out.” Others have undergone examinations that appeared normal with their head facing forward, yet their symptoms return with a particular neck movement.

At Caring Medical, our discussion of these symptoms includes the relationship between cervical structures and nearby blood vessels. One specific condition is Bow Hunter syndrome, also called rotational vertebral artery occlusion syndrome. In this condition, a neck position mechanically narrows or closes a vertebral artery and produces symptoms related to the circulation supplying the back of the brain. Symptoms range from transient vertigo to posterior-circulation stroke. (1)

Cervical instability can contribute in selected patients. However, instability is one possible mechanism among several, and dizziness with head turning does not establish the diagnosis. Understanding the actual cause of compression is essential before drawing conclusions about treatment.

What is the difference between vertebrobasilar insufficiency and Bow Hunter syndrome?

The two vertebral arteries travel upward through the neck and generally join inside the skull to form the basilar artery. This circulation supplies important parts of the brainstem, cerebellum, and posterior brain.

Vertebrobasilar insufficiency describes inadequate blood supply in this circulation. Bow Hunter syndrome describes a particular positional mechanism: external compression or distortion of an artery during head movement. Narrowing is called stenosis; complete blockage is called occlusion. Although rotation gives the syndrome its name, other movements can provoke dynamic arterial compromise. (1)

This distinction matters because an arterial circulation problem can have causes other than positional compression. Conversely, many causes of positional dizziness do not involve an artery at all. The diagnosis must connect the symptoms, the provoking position, and a relevant vascular abnormality.

Symptoms: “Every time I turn my head, I get dizzy”

Symptoms reported in Bow Hunter syndrome include spinning vertigo, lightheadedness, visual disturbance, ringing in the ears, imbalance, and fainting. Their relationship to a particular head position can be an important clue. Returning toward neutral may relieve an episode, but that response alone is not diagnostic. (2)

Patients may also describe sudden falls, difficulty coordinating their movements, or symptoms that interfere with looking over a shoulder. A “drop attack” is a description of an event, not a diagnosis: sudden falls and loss of consciousness have several possible explanations.

When symptoms require emergency attention

Sudden double vision or loss of vision, difficulty speaking or swallowing, new weakness or numbness, inability to walk normally, or severe new dizziness with neurological symptoms may indicate a stroke. Emergency assessment is necessary even if the symptoms improve. A previous normal scan or a suspected neck problem should not be used to dismiss a new episode.

Repeatedly turning the head to reproduce fainting, visual loss, or neurological symptoms is not a safe home diagnostic test. Suspected vascular compromise also warrants medical assessment before forceful neck manipulation or end-range neck exercises.

Why dizziness does not automatically mean arterial compression

Potential alternatives include benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, vestibular migraine, other inner-ear disorders, orthostatic hypotension, heart-rhythm disturbances, and medication effects. More than one condition can be present.

A separate proposed mechanism, cervicogenic dizziness, involves altered information from neck muscles and joints about head position. It remains diagnostically challenging and should not be equated with demonstrated arterial occlusion. (3)

Our broader discussion of dizziness, vertigo, vestibular disorders, and the cervical spine addresses these overlapping symptom patterns. Arterial compression, venous drainage problems, and autonomic symptoms require their own evidence; they should not be treated as interchangeable explanations.

Why are the vertebral arteries vulnerable to neck movement?

Much of each vertebral artery passes through openings in the cervical vertebrae. Near C1 and C2, the artery changes direction as it approaches the skull. This close relationship to moving bones and surrounding tissues helps explain why a structural abnormality can sometimes cause position-dependent narrowing. (1)

The illustration shows the close relationship between the vertebral artery and the upper cervical spine. It explains anatomical vulnerability; an illustration cannot establish that compression occurs in an individual patient.

The relevant question is not simply whether an artery lies near a vertebra. It is whether a specific movement produces clinically meaningful narrowing, arterial injury, or impaired downstream circulation.

What can cause rotational vertebral artery compression?

Bone spurs, degeneration, and other compressing structures

Published descriptions include osteophytes, degenerative cervical changes, disc abnormalities, fibrous or tendinous bands, and less common structural lesions. Their relative importance varies between reported populations. A bone spur should not automatically be attributed to ligament laxity, and the absence of a bone spur does not prove instability. (1)

A review of 193 published cases found degenerative causes predominated; only two cases were attributed to primary rotational atlantoaxial instability. These are counts from published reports, not a population study or a reliable estimate of an individual patient’s risk. (4)

Cervical instability and C1–C2 hypermobility

Atlantoaxial instability means abnormal movement between the atlas, C1, and the axis, C2. Ligaments help these joints remain stable while allowing head movement. In selected patients, abnormal motion can alter the relationship between an artery and surrounding structures.

One reported patient had rotational C1–C2 subluxation and position-dependent vertebral artery compromise demonstrated with dynamic CT angiography. Symptoms resolved after C1–C2 fusion following clinical and imaging deterioration. This supports instability as a possible cause; it does not show that all patients with hypermobility have vascular compression. (4)

Ponticulus posticus and other anatomical variations

A ponticulus posticus is a bony bridge on C1 that can form a passage around the vertebral artery. Such variants may be incidental. When symptoms raise concern, their significance depends on the artery’s actual course and what happens during movement.

A pediatric case-based review describes how anomalous C1 bone formation can contribute to arterial injury and rotational occlusion. Finding an anatomical variant alone is insufficient to establish symptomatic Bow Hunter syndrome. (5)

Our ponticulus posticus article provides a more detailed explanation of this anatomy.

Compression can occur below C1–C2

The lower cervical spine deserves attention. In a small institutional series, confirmed compression occurred at both upper and lower cervical levels. (6)

A more recent case involved a 72-year-old man with cerebellar infarction. Investigators identified osteophyte-related arterial compression and thrombus at C3–4 together with instability-related occlusion at C4–5. He remained free of recurrence for more than two years after operative decompression. The report illustrates how more than one lesion can contribute to the same vascular problem. (7)

Why a normal scan may not answer a positional question

A neutral-position scan shows the anatomy in that position. It may not demonstrate narrowing that occurs only during a particular movement. This does not mean a normal scan proves hidden instability; it means the clinical question and the imaging method must match.

A published case involved a 19-year-old man with dizziness, visual darkening, and altered consciousness after looking upward. Dynamic CT angiography demonstrated rotation-dependent interruption of vertebral artery flow that would not have been apparent from neutral-position vascular imaging alone. (8)

This remains a useful learning point for patients whose symptoms have been difficult to explain: a positional vascular disorder may require a positional assessment, but the decision to provoke symptoms must be made with appropriate medical safeguards.

How is Bow Hunter syndrome evaluated?

The assessment must address both the artery and the surrounding cervical structures. It also needs to consider evidence of previous ischemia, dissection, or another cause of the symptoms.

CT angiography and MR angiography

CT angiography can show vascular anatomy in relation to bone. MR angiography provides vascular information without the same CT-based radiation exposure. Selected dynamic examinations may demonstrate positional changes. The appropriate test depends on the suspected lesion, previous findings, and procedural risks. (4)

Dynamic ultrasound: relevant research in a 2026 journal issue

Dynamic ultrasound can evaluate changes in blood-flow measurements with head position. A study published online in 2025 and assigned to a January 2026 issue compared 49 suspected cases with 49 asymptomatic controls. It found positional changes in vertebral artery velocity and resistance and proposed diagnostic thresholds. The principal analysis reported sensitivity of 67.3% and specificity of 85.7%; a separate pilot group contained only ten participants. (9)

These results support further use and validation of dynamic ultrasound. They also illustrate its limits: a screening result can miss cases or identify abnormalities that need clarification. Velocity may rise near a narrowing rather than simply fall. Measurements depend on the vessel segment, position, and technique; the study’s thresholds should not be converted into universal rules. (9)

Our dynamic blood-flow analysis page discusses positional measurements. Extracranial ultrasound examines vessels in the neck, while transcranial Doppler measures velocities in accessible intracranial vessels. Findings require interpretation alongside the clinical and anatomical evidence.

Dynamic catheter angiography

Dynamic catheter-directed digital subtraction angiography is commonly described as the diagnostic reference standard. It can demonstrate the location and behavior of an arterial narrowing during carefully controlled positioning.

A systematic review included 104 reported cases, with diagnosis established in 102. Fourteen patients had symptoms during flexion or extension, and some had bilateral or multiple sites of occlusion. No procedural complications were reported in the included cases. However, published-case evidence cannot establish that an invasive procedure is risk-free. This review first appeared online in 2024 and was assigned to a 2026 journal issue. (10)

What motion X-rays can and cannot show

Digital Motion X-ray and other cervical motion studies examine movement of bones. They may provide information about a suspected mechanical abnormality, but they do not directly demonstrate arterial lumen closure or establish that blood supply to the brain is inadequate.

Our original article included an X-ray example showing different C1–C2 spacing during flexion and extension. The useful lesson is that alignment can change with position. It would be inaccurate to infer from the spacing alone that every structure between the bones is compressed or that a vertebral artery is occluded.

Published cases: what they teach and what they do not prove

A child with recurrent stroke and ligament laxity

A pediatric review combined 25 previously reported patients with a new case involving a 12-year-old girl. Her bilateral vascular compression became apparent during head-turn angiography, and abnormal ligamentous laxity was observed during surgery. Reported treatments included medication, collars, decompression, fusion, or combinations. (11)

This case supports attention to ligamentous stability when the vascular findings warrant it. It does not establish that injections can replace indicated treatment for a child with recurrent stroke.

A teenager who lost consciousness during yoga

A 2024 report described a pediatric patient with symptoms of vertebral artery insufficiency during neck rotation and documented rotational C1–C2 instability. Dynamic neck CT and provocative angiography were central to the diagnosis. (12)

The original article’s account of a fall during yoga remains a useful warning about the consequences of fainting during extreme neck positioning. A young age does not exclude a clinically important vascular disorder.

Eye movements can offer clues

In a reported 47-year-old woman, head rotation provoked vertigo and nystagmus, an involuntary eye movement. The direction of nystagmus changed as her head returned toward neutral. Symptoms improved following a change in her hypertension prescription. (13)

The report supports careful examination of eye movements and medication history. It should not be interpreted as a recommendation for patients to change their own blood-pressure medication.

Recurrent strokes after sleeping with the head turned

A 2024 report described a 25-year-old woman with three posterior-circulation infarctions after sleeping prone with her head rotated. Dynamic vascular examinations demonstrated positional flow interruption. No further recurrence was reported following C1–C2 fixation. (14)

This is evidence about a specific patient’s mechanism, not proof that ordinary prone sleeping causes stroke in the general population. Sleep position can nevertheless be a relevant historical detail when recurrent events occur on awakening.

Arterial injury without an obvious skeletal abnormality

A separate report described a 64-year-old man with recurrent stroke and small bilateral vertebral artery aneurysms near C1–C2. No skeletal abnormality was identified. Recurrences stopped and the aneurysms decreased after collar use together with antithrombotic treatment. (15)

The original article described this as unseen instability. More accurately, the authors suspected chronic mechanical arterial injury; they did not demonstrate a cervical skeletal abnormality. Because treatments were combined, the outcome cannot be attributed to the collar alone.

An unusual arterial branch can matter

A reported 71-year-old man had a posterior inferior cerebellar artery arising outside the skull near C1–C2. Head rotation occluded that branch and narrowed the vertebral artery. Symptoms resolved after decompression. (16)

This rare variation illustrates why the individual vascular anatomy matters. It does not mean Bow Hunter syndrome usually originates in that branch.

Nonsurgical treatment: what is supported?

Conservative management described in the literature includes avoiding symptom-provoking positions, selected collar use, and physician-directed medication when indicated. These approaches have different purposes: reducing mechanical provocation is different from reducing clot-related risk.

In a 21-patient observational study, 19 received conservative treatment. None of those 19 developed posterior-circulation stroke during follow-up, and four had resolution of symptoms. This is encouraging for selected patients, but the study was not a randomized comparison with surgery. It cannot establish that conservative treatment is equally effective for all causes or severities of Bow Hunter syndrome. (2)

Why a collar may help some patients

A collar can limit movement into a position that provokes compression. It does not remove an osteophyte, necessarily heal an arterial injury, or prove that damaged ligaments are the underlying cause. Collar type, fit, tolerance, and duration are medical decisions.

This example illustrates differences in cervical motion with collar support. It is not a measurement of arterial blood flow and does not establish protection against stroke.

When decompression or fusion may be necessary

Decompression removes or releases a structure pressing on an artery. Fusion stabilizes a spinal segment and reduces motion there. Depending on the lesion, either approach or a combination may be considered. Recurrent ischemia, arterial injury, documented instability, and the specific compressing structure affect the decision.

In a small institutional series, nine patients underwent decompression without fusion; one later required fusion for instability five years afterward. This demonstrates a possible long-term complication, not that decompression inevitably fails. Fusion can limit movement, especially at upper cervical levels, but its effect on activities varies. It is inaccurate to state that every patient becomes unable to drive. (6)

New 2026 report: lower-cervical surgery and confirmation of arterial patency

A 2026 report described two patients with compression at C4–5 or C5–6. Both underwent osteophyte removal and fusion. Intraoperative angiography during simulated head turning confirmed that the artery remained open, and both reported complete symptom resolution at six weeks. (17)

The report reinforces two practical points: compression can occur below C1–C2, and a dynamic problem may need dynamic confirmation after treatment. Two cases with short follow-up cannot establish the best operation for every patient. Endovascular treatment also has a role in selected circumstances, but it is not a universal solution for an external mechanical lesion. (17) (1)

Caring Medical’s perspective on ligament laxity and cervical instability

Our clinical perspective emphasizes the supporting ligaments of the cervical spine. Our published narrative review discusses capsular ligament laxity, abnormal joint motion, chronic neck pain, and possible neurological or vascular consequences. It provides an anatomical and clinical framework; it is not a controlled trial establishing the cause of Bow Hunter syndrome or the effectiveness of a vascular treatment. (18)

For patients with neck pain and multiple symptoms, this framework raises a reasonable question: could abnormal cervical movement be contributing? The next question is equally important: what evidence demonstrates the particular mechanism in this patient?

A finding of hypermobility, a change in cervical alignment, or symptoms after whiplash does not answer every vascular question. Demonstrating instability and demonstrating positional arterial compromise are related but separate tasks.

Existing video: cervical symptoms and autonomic explanations

The accompanying original discussion addresses dizziness, balance, heart rate, and blood-pressure symptoms through a proposed cervical and autonomic framework. Autonomic nerve signaling and arterial occlusion are different mechanisms. The video provides clinical perspective and should not be used as independent confirmation of Bow Hunter syndrome.

Cervical lordosis and blood flow: retaining the research with appropriate limits

Cervical lordosis is the normal inward curve of the neck. Its relationship to vascular measurements is worth discussing, while recognizing that a straightened curve is not itself a diagnosis of arterial occlusion.

A 2016 study compared 30 people with loss of lordosis with 30 matched controls. Some vertebral artery measurements, including diameter, flow volume, and peak systolic velocity, were lower in the group with reduced lordosis. This was an association study; it did not establish that curve correction treats Bow Hunter syndrome. (19)

A 2019 retrospective series of seven patients reported changes in cerebral arterial area and MRA pixel intensity after cervical lordosis correction. These were indirect imaging measures in an uncontrolled series. The findings are hypothesis-generating and do not establish durable restoration of brain perfusion or stroke prevention. (20)

A 2024 case report described a 25-year-old woman with bilateral Bow Hunter syndrome and loss of cervical curvature. She had no recurrence of characteristic symptoms during three months after collar use and avoidance of excessive rotation. The authors proposed a relationship with curvature; the case did not isolate curvature as the cause or test a curve-restoration treatment. (21)

These studies support further investigation of alignment and vascular mechanics. They do not support unsupervised traction, head weighting, or aggressive curve exercises in someone with suspected arterial compromise.

Prolotherapy: the proposed role and the evidence boundary

Prolotherapy involves injections intended to stimulate a local repair response in musculoskeletal supporting tissues. At Caring Medical, our published perspective discusses its potential role when ligament laxity contributes to chronic neck pain and instability. (18)

It is important to distinguish three outcomes: improvement in neck pain, improvement in mechanical stability, and demonstrated resolution of position-dependent arterial compromise. Improvement in one does not establish the others.

Current evidence does not establish Prolotherapy as a proven treatment to reopen a dynamically occluded vertebral artery or prevent Bow Hunter–related stroke. The cervical ligament review does not supply that evidence. Claims about a regenerative approach should remain separate from proven treatment of an identified arterial lesion.

What should patients understand about their diagnosis?

The most useful questions concern the demonstrated mechanism:

• Was an arterial abnormality actually identified, and at which level?
• Does it change with the position associated with symptoms?
• Is there evidence of arterial injury, previous ischemia, or another circulation problem?
• Is instability documented, or is it a proposed explanation?
• What outcome does the treatment evidence support: less pain, fewer symptoms, improved arterial patency, or reduced recurrence of ischemic events?

These distinctions preserve the central message of our original article: some important neck-related problems become apparent only during movement. They also prevent a broad symptom pattern from being mistaken for a confirmed vascular diagnosis.

Medical disclaimer: This article provides general education and does not diagnose the cause of dizziness, fainting, or neurological symptoms. Suspected stroke symptoms require emergency assessment. Evaluation and treatment of suspected rotational arterial compromise require appropriately qualified medical care.

References

1 Duan G, Xu J, Shi J, Cao Y. Advances in the Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Treatment of Bow Hunter’s Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature. Interventional neurology. 2016;5(1-2):29-38. doi:10.1159/000444306. [Google Scholar]

2 Choi KD, Choi JH, Kim JS, Kim HJ, Kim MJ, Lee TH, Lee H, Moon IS, Oh HJ, Kim JI. Rotational vertebral artery occlusion: mechanisms and long-term outcome. Stroke. 2013;44(7):1817-1824. doi:10.1161/strokeaha.113.001219. [Google Scholar]

3 Sung YH. Upper cervical spine dysfunction and dizziness. Journal of exercise rehabilitation. 2020;16(5):385-391. doi:10.12965/jer.2040612.306. [Google Scholar]

4 Schulz R, Donoso R, Weissman K. Rotational vertebral artery occlusion (“bow hunter syndrome”). European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society. 2021;30(6):1440-1450. doi:10.1007/s00586-020-06680-5. [Google Scholar]

5 Greiner HM, Abruzzo TA, Kabbouche M, Leach JL, Zuccarello M. Rotational vertebral artery occlusion in a child with multiple strokes: a case-based update. Child’s nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery. 2010;26(12):1669-1674. doi:10.1007/s00381-010-1299-3. [Google Scholar]

6 Zaidi HA, Albuquerque FC, Chowdhry SA, Zabramski JM, Ducruet AF, Spetzler RF. Diagnosis and management of bow hunter’s syndrome: 15-year experience at barrow neurological institute. World neurosurgery. 2014;82(5):733-738. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2014.02.027. [Google Scholar]

7 Yokoya S, Nakauchi J, Takezawa H. Bow-Hunter Syndrome Due to Tandem Lesions; A Case Report. Asian journal of neurosurgery. 2025;20(1):174-178. doi:10.1055/s-0044-1792160. [Google Scholar]

8 Shi C, Wang L, Dou Y, Yang F, Qiao Y, Zhang H. Dynamic CT angiography of the head and neck in the diagnosis of Bow Hunter’s Syndrome: A case report. Radiology case reports. 2020;15(11):2275-2277. doi:10.1016/j.radcr.2020.08.022. [Google Scholar]

9 Meng X, Fu H, Tong Y, Zhang Y, Sun L. Hemodynamic Changes in Rotational Vertebral Artery Syndrome: Diagnostic Role of Dynamic Ultrasound and Identified Thresholds. Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2026;45(1):5-15. doi:10.1002/jum.70033. [Google Scholar]

10 Choi JW, Qiao Y, Mehta TI, Wilson JN, Torigoe TH, Tsappidi S, Zhang YJ, Brown SC, Hui FK, Abruzzo T. Safety and efficacy of dynamic catheter-directed cerebral digital subtraction angiography for diagnosis of bowhunter syndrome spectrum disorders: A systematic review of the literature. Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences. 2026;32(4):1615-1626. doi:10.1177/15910199241236820. [Google Scholar]

11 Golomb MR, Ducis KA, Martinez ML. Bow Hunter’s Syndrome in Children: A Review of the Literature and Presentation of a New Case in a 12-Year-Old Girl. Journal of child neurology. 2020;35(11):767-772. doi:10.1177/0883073820927108. [Google Scholar]

12 Malini S, Anu C Thomas, Sajeev S Vadakkedam, Parameswaran K, Anand M. Bow Hunter’s Syndrome with Rotational Atlantoaxial Instability: A Rare Association. Asian journal of neurosurgery. 2024;19(3):572-575. doi:10.1055/s-0044-1787865. [Google Scholar]

13 Nomura Y, Toi T, Ogawa Y, Oshima T, Saito Y. Transitional nystagmus in a Bow Hunter’s Syndrome case report. BMC neurology. 2020;20(1):435. doi:10.1186/s12883-020-02009-3. [Google Scholar]

14 Sakai S, Kasuya M, Kobayashi Y, Nonaka K, Suzuki M, Machida A. Bilateral bow-hunter’s stroke caused by sleeping in prone position: A case of recurrent posterior circulation infarction. Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association. 2024;33(12):108075. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.108075. [Google Scholar]

15 Komatsu K, Ozaki A, Iwasaki K, Matsumoto S. Bilateral Vertebral Artery Aneurysms at the Atlantoaxial Joint Level Causing Recurrent Stroke. Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan). 2016;55(22):3365-3368. doi:10.2169/internalmedicine.55.6956. [Google Scholar]

16 Enomoto N, Yagi K, Matsubara S, Uno M. Case Report: Bow Hunter’s Syndrome Caused by Compression of Extracranially Originated Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery. Frontiers in neurology. 2021;12:756838. doi:10.3389/fneur.2021.756838. [Google Scholar]

17 Barpujari A, Walker EN, Gandhi OH, Rashad MS, Almasri S, Glauser G, Borja AJ, Choudhri OA. Intraoperative High-Resolution 2-Dimensional and 3-Dimensional Angiography in Cervical Decompression for Subaxial Bow Hunter’s Syndrome. World neurosurgery. 2026;212:125125. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2026.125125. [Google Scholar]

18 Steilen D, Hauser R, Woldin B, Sawyer S. Chronic neck pain: making the connection between capsular ligament laxity and cervical instability. The open orthopaedics journal. 2014;8:326-345. doi:10.2174/1874325001408010326. [Google Scholar]

19 Bulut MD, Alpayci M, Şenköy E, Bora A, Yazmalar L, Yavuz A, Gülşen İ. Decreased Vertebral Artery Hemodynamics in Patients with Loss of Cervical Lordosis. Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research. 2016;22:495-500. doi:10.12659/msm.897500. [Google Scholar]

20 Katz EA, Katz SB, Fedorchuk CA, Lightstone DF, Banach CJ, Podoll JD. Increase in cerebral blood flow indicated by increased cerebral arterial area and pixel intensity on brain magnetic resonance angiogram following correction of cervical lordosis. Brain circulation. 2019;5(1):19-26. doi:10.4103/bc.bc_25_18. [Google Scholar]

21 Wang S, Bi Y, Chen Y. Bilateral Bow Hunter Syndrome Associated with Loss of Cervical Physiological Curvature. The American journal of case reports. 2024;25:e942609. doi:10.12659/ajcr.942609. [Google Scholar]

 

 

The problems of vertebrobasilar insufficiency are not problems that sit in isolation. A patient that suffers from vertebrobasilar insufficiency will likely be seen to suffer from many problems as they all relate to upper cervical neck ligament damage and cervical instability

Prolotherapy, the curve of the neck and blood flow